"you are being girlier about this than i've ever seen you be."
that's what i was told last night. it was only true because i was catching brian up on my neurotic brain patterns of about a week. compressed, those patterns create a total chick (i can blame where i am in my cycle, right?). he gave me a really good explanation of the simple manner in which the male brain works and explained that females tend to over-analyze words spoken and subsequent actions. i feel like i understand the world so much better now.
i get all these thoughts and have all these internal conflicts about my femininity, especially since i am the only female in my social network. oh god, i could go on for hours about what level female i am and what type of post-feminist i'd be if i ever chose to walk the path of an uppity idealist. i could go on for tens of minutes about self-expression through dress and what it means to me. i could go on for days about body image and hating to look in mirrors versus societal pressure versus early life experience versus health versus wanting to wear a certain style jeans versus loving chocolate too much versus male attention versus volume of sex versus quality of sex versus breast size versus versus versus ad nauseum. but at the end of the day, i find myself among men who don't really care to hear any of this. i've been told, "you're like a dude with boobs." thanks?
i think about how there are myriad blogs by women about their dating lives. i call it the "
carrie bradshaw syndrome". i don't know of any blogs like this written by dudes. i'm sure they exist. but i'm sure the female-run-lovelife blogs outnumber the dude-run-lovelife blogs. hence chicks being too emotional and over-analytical and searching for meaning behind every stupid meaningless interaction.
brian opened my proverbial eyes. to all future boyfriends (assuming i retain this point of view): you owe brian, bigtime. i now recognize that i need to look at things more simply, take it at face value. i will be your dream girlfriend.
not to say that i'll be able to vanquish emotion from my experience-digesting-mechanism. i am a
squirming coil of emotions. rather, i will be more understanding that most things said and done don't have as much thought behind them as i give after the fact.
roger and i were talking about life's mysteries recently (i was telling him all of these things i like to think about regarding human experience of time and the afterlife and ghosts and, you know, synchronicity) and he said "why do you have to add mystery and 'magic' to life? why can't it just be what it is?" i guess that's the moral i got from brian's talk. boys are so smart!!
of course, i am a huge hypocrite: writing an overly analytical blog post about the existence of and my distaste for overly analytical blogs by women about love and men. i blame these:

right?