for the last, i dunno maybe 2 months, i've been corresponding with a friend almost solely by hand-written missives. there is a liberating commitment that comes with the absence of a backspace key.
after you've written three pages of thoughts and then you write a paragraph that you aren't so crazy about, you tend to just leave it there on the page. you don't draw a line through it, you don't scribble it out, you don't even own white-out anymore. you just leave it and carry on with a better idea on the next line. it's a little scary but it is also intimate and real.
this is made more immediate when that page is seen by eyes other than your own. when that page is not safely tucked in one of the countless notebooks on your shelf that may not be cracked open for another year. that page gets folded up and sent across the country and then you have no control over it anymore.
i just deleted the four paragraphs that led my mind to wander to the first in this post. they were irrelevant. would i have done that on wood-based paper? would i have torn it from the spiral binding, crumpled it and thrown it on the floor to later be transported to the recycling bin? maybe. would i have turned a page and started my story over fresh, from scratch? probably not. it would have been a different story completely.
we are so self-conscious, thus bent on self-editing, as our interactions move more and more into the digital sphere. we forget that we are the only ones paying such close attention to our selves. i see (and participate in) a lot of digital impulsivity, but that impulsivity is editable. physical impulsivity, in terms of communication, is a little tougher to edit.
i spent the winter corresponding with a different friend almost solely by e-mail. our conversations were mostly abstract and i find him to be much smarter than i and so my backspace key was a crucial player in the composition of my letters to him. indeed, i probably deleted more sentences than he ever read from me. i wonder if our conversation would have lasted if we had used pen and paper rather than keyboards and gmail. i probably would have given up early on.
i guess that's what makes digital communications great, right? we can better convey exactly the message we aim to express without 1.) wasting all that paper and 2.) revealing too much of ourselves through the thought-processes that lead us to our conclusions. but it seems something more than words/sentences/paragraphs is lost with the depression of the backspace key. we lose the traceable thought process. we lose the vulnerability of gestating ideas. we lose the communication of that which makes us unique.
i am constantly trying to find balance between the old and the new. i think we all are. we are in the midst of a communication revolution and it's hard to know if it's all for the better or if the marketers just want us to believe that.
i am far more excited and pleased when tearing open a pen-scrawled, adhesive-licked, transit-soiled envelope than when clicking on a bold, unread e-mail subject line. that's not to say i don't enjoy a good e-mail exchange or that i don't appreciate new media. i love new media, y'all. you know that.
but sometimes it's nice to revert to the simpler times and ponder whether we're really making the best use of these internets. what do you think?